Summary: Mystical Digits updates pages when factual mistakes, broken links, or misleading framing are found. This page explains how corrections are handled and where readers can send feedback.
Direct answer: If a page contains a factual error, broken link, outdated statement, or framing that overstates certainty, Mystical Digits aims to review and correct it. Meaningful updates may change page copy, links, examples, or disclaimers, and reader feedback is part of that process.
What qualifies for correction
- Broken or misrouted links
- Outdated factual statements
- Unsupported claims that should be removed or softened
- Misleading titles, descriptions, or headings
- Incorrect attributions or author details
What qualifies for update rather than correction
- Routine clarity improvements
- Structure upgrades for readability
- Internal-link improvements
- Expanded disclaimers on sensitive topics
How to request a correction
Use the contact page and include the URL, the issue, and the suggested fix or source if available.
Review process
- Review the page and the reported issue.
- Verify whether the issue is factual, structural, or interpretive.
- Correct the page, revise the framing, or add a limitation note where needed.